Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 13:02:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 40A825FD34432D097158819C89551EE1BA8D5D6CBE2CDE87A9C7B194A3E5AF06
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note being proposed is misleading: 1. Civil and criminal cases have different evidentiary standards, with civil cases having lower standards. 2. The note implies Trump would be found guilty but for the expiration of statute of limitations. https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/lawsuits-and-the-court-process/evidentiary-standards-and-burdens-of-proof/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852504640937402392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 40A825FD34432D097158819C89551EE1BA8D5D6CBE2CDE87A9C7B194A3E5AF06
  • createdAtMillis - 1730552551353
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185250464093740239240A825FD34432D097158819C89551EE1BA8D5D6CBE2CDE87A9C7B194A3E5AF06