Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 20:44:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1432E1C0151CC470C7172894B3A574B89CBC76030EE05B1B294C5BF140C01B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed notes are defining the term “intrusive thought” and adding the author’s opinion, which is unnecessary considering the tweet author is stating opinion

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852470333913420180
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E1432E1C0151CC470C7172894B3A574B89CBC76030EE05B1B294C5BF140C01B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1730580259397
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852470333913420180E1432E1C0151CC470C7172894B3A574B89CBC76030EE05B1B294C5BF140C01B5