Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 04:31:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9F02589DF51E9242A124FB27DC66532C4899785D56C1BA8AE2D9B8960EBED23
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wired’s data for the report is non-representative due to self-admitted selection bias. One of the report’s authors, Tess Owen, confirms that the writers are not including acts of criminal vandalism, even when coupled with threatening messages, as examples of harassment. https://x.com/misstessowen/status/1852428742439702993

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852442225063456993
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9F02589DF51E9242A124FB27DC66532C4899785D56C1BA8AE2D9B8960EBED23
  • createdAtMillis - 1730521898303
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852442225063456993A9F02589DF51E9242A124FB27DC66532C4899785D56C1BA8AE2D9B8960EBED23