Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 23:12:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C77A051C127DA8014B0955D4F2FA6BF6379C50D4D7160F592F6699AF7D124442
Participant Details

Original Note:

当該ポストは個人的な意見を述べているに過ぎず、また泉氏は「再精査すべき」と述べるに留まっており、これ自体が誤解を招く内容ではありません。 政策の是非について様々な是非があることは当然ですが、コミュニティノートではなくリプライ等で主張・議論すべきです。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852432900224102720
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C77A051C127DA8014B0955D4F2FA6BF6379C50D4D7160F592F6699AF7D124442
  • createdAtMillis - 1730502753556
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852432900224102720C77A051C127DA8014B0955D4F2FA6BF6379C50D4D7160F592F6699AF7D124442