Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 10:20:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B42927F50B4A6546593A5785A2ED9C4A0192F24155D0086087544A6CBF68E56E
Participant Details

Original Note:

当該ポストは個人的な意見を述べているに過ぎず、また泉氏は「再精査すべき」と述べるに留まっており、これ自体が誤解を招く内容ではありません。 政策の是非について様々な是非があることは当然ですが、コミュニティノートではなくリプライ等で主張・議論すべきです。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852432900224102720
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B42927F50B4A6546593A5785A2ED9C4A0192F24155D0086087544A6CBF68E56E
  • createdAtMillis - 1730542801099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852432900224102720B42927F50B4A6546593A5785A2ED9C4A0192F24155D0086087544A6CBF68E56E