Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 05:24:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1CC50FC895F80264934FF0C161816F0505C6DC19E678CD9E52518F3A2D4EF198
Participant Details

Original Note:

当該ポストは個人的な意見を述べているに過ぎず、また泉氏は「再精査すべき」と述べるに留まっており、これ自体が誤解を招く内容ではありません。 政策の是非について様々な是非があることは当然ですが、コミュニティノートではなくリプライ等で主張・議論すべきです。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852432900224102720
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1CC50FC895F80264934FF0C161816F0505C6DC19E678CD9E52518F3A2D4EF198
  • createdAtMillis - 1730525049014
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18524329002241027201CC50FC895F80264934FF0C161816F0505C6DC19E678CD9E52518F3A2D4EF198