Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 17:18:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF81CB07FF5FC4B49CA52BB7F4944747D917F8D8809A31CDA61532EEB526A355
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the proposed CN is just an 'ackshually' post - while it's factually correct, it is irrelevant and unnecessary for the context of the post made. Stick to comments for that please. The focus of the post is the comments attributed to Haaretz, not their purported size.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852398988323852586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF81CB07FF5FC4B49CA52BB7F4944747D917F8D8809A31CDA61532EEB526A355
  • createdAtMillis - 1730481506222
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852398988323852586BF81CB07FF5FC4B49CA52BB7F4944747D917F8D8809A31CDA61532EEB526A355