Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 15:48:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE25BACE9FAB6A54AECF39DB0FF4AB0DFA9EA6366D316FB7F2F67751AF9DD58F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the proposed CN is just an 'ackshually' post - while it's factually correct, it is irrelevant and unnecessary for the context of the post made. Stick to comments for that please. The focus of the post is the comments attributed to Haaretz, not their purported size.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852398988323852586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE25BACE9FAB6A54AECF39DB0FF4AB0DFA9EA6366D316FB7F2F67751AF9DD58F
  • createdAtMillis - 1730562522890
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852398988323852586BE25BACE9FAB6A54AECF39DB0FF4AB0DFA9EA6366D316FB7F2F67751AF9DD58F