Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 21:35:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 982BF1F8034BFC04B24679FE8842F18220D03301AF505A1D0E7B6E4FFDCE8662
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the proposed CN is just an 'ackshually' post - while it's factually correct, it is irrelevant and unnecessary for the context of the post made. Stick to comments for that please. The focus of the post is the comments attributed to Haaretz, not their purported size.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852398988323852586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 982BF1F8034BFC04B24679FE8842F18220D03301AF505A1D0E7B6E4FFDCE8662
  • createdAtMillis - 1730496941661
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852398988323852586982BF1F8034BFC04B24679FE8842F18220D03301AF505A1D0E7B6E4FFDCE8662