Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 17:09:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73417AB0D75D66CF58FEDF9F8BD46FC66100E2A818F1B0DE7ED4F9CC4DF2008D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the proposed CN is just an 'ackshually' post - while it's factually correct, it is irrelevant and unnecessary for the context of the post made. Stick to comments for that please. The focus of the post is the comments attributed to Haaretz, not their purported size.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852398988323852586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 73417AB0D75D66CF58FEDF9F8BD46FC66100E2A818F1B0DE7ED4F9CC4DF2008D
  • createdAtMillis - 1730567356419
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185239898832385258673417AB0D75D66CF58FEDF9F8BD46FC66100E2A818F1B0DE7ED4F9CC4DF2008D