Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 00:26:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 42013786F8F6878AFD398B99A99B83506E9BC631004040FBFC0C4BC0E7240EB2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the proposed CN is just an 'ackshually' post - while it's factually correct, it is irrelevant and unnecessary for the context of the post made. Stick to comments for that please. The focus of the post is the comments attributed to Haaretz, not their purported size.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852398988323852586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 42013786F8F6878AFD398B99A99B83506E9BC631004040FBFC0C4BC0E7240EB2
  • createdAtMillis - 1730507163966
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185239898832385258642013786F8F6878AFD398B99A99B83506E9BC631004040FBFC0C4BC0E7240EB2