Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 17:36:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AC37F2FC2A78FEBA77348DB7BF5C28AE154339D9538E5A89E5B535592331F03D
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence at all that “panda eyes” have any link to sodomy, pedophilia, or trauma, despite what the author clearly implies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raccoon_eyes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852368532316594379
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AC37F2FC2A78FEBA77348DB7BF5C28AE154339D9538E5A89E5B535592331F03D
  • createdAtMillis - 1730482577444
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1852368532316594379AC37F2FC2A78FEBA77348DB7BF5C28AE154339D9538E5A89E5B535592331F03D