Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 04:26:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6E445B5156BAFAF84DAD802B2801BA8F77EB0CC8A0FF4BA1897BC0A9AD500BF
Participant Details

Original Note:

線虫がん検査は精度が認められておらず、専門家やニュースメディアから度重なる批判を受けています。 https://www.asahi.com/sp/articles/ASRBN4RWSRBNTIPE00C.html https://newspicks.com/news/9350988/body?sentlog 的中率1%未満にも関わらず、運営会社は試算値を捏造し、日本核医学会からも注意喚起を含めた声明が出されています。 https://jcpet.jp/2024/10/senchu-chosa.html がん検査の偽陰性は絶命の原因になりうることを留意して下さい。 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10901000/001132580.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852282264018891203
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6E445B5156BAFAF84DAD802B2801BA8F77EB0CC8A0FF4BA1897BC0A9AD500BF
  • createdAtMillis - 1730521585665
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1852282264018891203A6E445B5156BAFAF84DAD802B2801BA8F77EB0CC8A0FF4BA1897BC0A9AD500BF