Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 14:29:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75945E33CCE7D04B037AD625CE17BA64E7C349FE5081697AE106960BDA5321C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

線虫がん検査は精度が認められておらず、専門家やニュースメディアから度重なる批判を受けています。 https://www.asahi.com/sp/articles/ASRBN4RWSRBNTIPE00C.html https://newspicks.com/news/9350988/body?sentlog 的中率1%未満にも関わらず、運営会社は試算値を捏造し、日本核医学会からも注意喚起を含めた声明が出されています。 https://jcpet.jp/2024/10/senchu-chosa.html がん検査の偽陰性は絶命の原因になりうることを留意して下さい。 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10901000/001132580.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852282264018891203
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75945E33CCE7D04B037AD625CE17BA64E7C349FE5081697AE106960BDA5321C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1732804199617
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185228226401889120375945E33CCE7D04B037AD625CE17BA64E7C349FE5081697AE106960BDA5321C0