Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 13:31:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66FF69280064EEC9034368CB5C795E5A4E34B964E9FB2190E14D65C5025C2A6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The stenographer’s office does not dispute the accuracy of the edited transcript as it was released. The difference in question is in the presence or absence of an apostrophe. https://apnews.com/article/326e2f516a94a470a423011a946b6252

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852199630307467268
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 66FF69280064EEC9034368CB5C795E5A4E34B964E9FB2190E14D65C5025C2A6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1730467910961
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 185219963030746726866FF69280064EEC9034368CB5C795E5A4E34B964E9FB2190E14D65C5025C2A6D