Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 12:03:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F80FEAEB660F4A905BF14F7B0B4C310043D350E0A2C1BA2BC1AC25094D11DC23
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no prohibition in the Presidential Records Act on the White House Press Office publicly releasing a version of a transcript that differs from the stenographer’s. There is a prohibition on retaining documents covered by the PRA, which prosecutors allege Trump did. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title44/chapter22&edition=prelim

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852182307525767391
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F80FEAEB660F4A905BF14F7B0B4C310043D350E0A2C1BA2BC1AC25094D11DC23
  • createdAtMillis - 1730462618772
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852182307525767391F80FEAEB660F4A905BF14F7B0B4C310043D350E0A2C1BA2BC1AC25094D11DC23