Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 03:55:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1061978CD479C5245E67A84FCA26C48518993C51E64B02F43BAFF10E147D622
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no prohibition in the Presidential Records Act on the White House Press Office publicly releasing a version of a transcript that differs from the stenographer’s. There is a prohibition on retaining documents covered by the PRA, which prosecutors allege Trump did. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title44/chapter22&edition=prelim

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852182307525767391
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1061978CD479C5245E67A84FCA26C48518993C51E64B02F43BAFF10E147D622
  • createdAtMillis - 1730433312096
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1852182307525767391C1061978CD479C5245E67A84FCA26C48518993C51E64B02F43BAFF10E147D622