Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 10:09:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7307E7A0EB0E598AA74FB8A50BCF233EC09A2C5C748FC8733ED858296A9BB2A1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The stenographer’s office does not dispute the accuracy of the edited transcript as it was released. The difference in question is in the presence or absence of an apostrophe. https://apnews.com/article/326e2f516a94a470a423011a946b6252

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852181087721537999
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7307E7A0EB0E598AA74FB8A50BCF233EC09A2C5C748FC8733ED858296A9BB2A1
  • createdAtMillis - 1730455761826
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18521810877215379997307E7A0EB0E598AA74FB8A50BCF233EC09A2C5C748FC8733ED858296A9BB2A1