Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 01:22:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4F5117D1651A288B05002257AF2B7BF7DF3AE9905BEABF3E5D934C07B35C9F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota sugerida é estapafúrdia. O post diz que tamanho investimento não é para dar conta dos vistos, mas para outras coisas. A nota lista justamente algumas dessas outras coisas, confirmando em vez de desmentir o que é dito no post. NNN até que provem algo errado no post

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852123189779857506
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4F5117D1651A288B05002257AF2B7BF7DF3AE9905BEABF3E5D934C07B35C9F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1730424120199
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852123189779857506F4F5117D1651A288B05002257AF2B7BF7DF3AE9905BEABF3E5D934C07B35C9F2