Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 06:11:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E25F92DC77B0ACC4336BFC0B7C6CFBF8E55FC957E294E3F63CA9E1B4F1A37E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota sugerida é estapafúrdia. O post diz que tamanho investimento não é para dar conta dos vistos, mas para outras coisas. A nota lista justamente algumas dessas outras coisas, confirmando em vez de desmentir o que é dito no post. NNN até que provem algo errado no post

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852123189779857506
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E25F92DC77B0ACC4336BFC0B7C6CFBF8E55FC957E294E3F63CA9E1B4F1A37E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1730441463333
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18521231897798575066E25F92DC77B0ACC4336BFC0B7C6CFBF8E55FC957E294E3F63CA9E1B4F1A37E6