Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 04:50:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F76379EFE72DD3E7B1E950E5C145930AFC3AC2E969AFE92398EF6986E812A961
Participant Details

Original Note:

‘What-about-ism’ is a weak argument. Better to focus on the fact that real doctors would be loathe to diagnose these symptoms over social media, and therefore the OP’s credibility is suspect. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9922936/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852080917030015283
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F76379EFE72DD3E7B1E950E5C145930AFC3AC2E969AFE92398EF6986E812A961
  • createdAtMillis - 1730436634795
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852080917030015283F76379EFE72DD3E7B1E950E5C145930AFC3AC2E969AFE92398EF6986E812A961