Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 14:37:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B42CD17A961953CFF1F098D86AC8CDD6C371E868713CBAF0FF97BA0AD278D470
Participant Details

Original Note:

Endorsement happened before paper's owner indicated this week no presidential endorsement will be offered. Most of this notoriously left wing board quit after paper deprived them of a tool to advance left wing agenda via biased endorsements as the one for @AlsobrooksForMD https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4911637-washington-post-endorses-alsobrooks/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1852063721251631189
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B42CD17A961953CFF1F098D86AC8CDD6C371E868713CBAF0FF97BA0AD278D470
createdAtMillis - 1730558269047
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1852063721251631189B42CD17A961953CFF1F098D86AC8CDD6C371E868713CBAF0FF97BA0AD278D470