Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 05:42:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 289AF0C20093FBFFDC827556EB4B68B3D3080727E740AE0483D8631D536BF3B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Endorsement happened before paper's owner indicated this week no presidential endorsement will be offered. Most of this notoriously left wing board quit after paper deprived them of a tool to advance left wing agenda via biased endorsements as the one for @AlsobrooksForMD https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4911637-washington-post-endorses-alsobrooks/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1852063721251631189
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 289AF0C20093FBFFDC827556EB4B68B3D3080727E740AE0483D8631D536BF3B5
createdAtMillis - 1730612545798
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1852063721251631189289AF0C20093FBFFDC827556EB4B68B3D3080727E740AE0483D8631D536BF3B5