Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 02:48:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC5E1892282669C26D46DFE393258385E6E1E31815A688AC264E450EB9D7C022
Participant Details

Original Note:

No diddy. https://www.tbsnews.net/splash/new-slang-no-diddy-goes-viral-replacing-no-homo-814606

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852033426800476478
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC5E1892282669C26D46DFE393258385E6E1E31815A688AC264E450EB9D7C022
  • createdAtMillis - 1730429326505
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1852033426800476478EC5E1892282669C26D46DFE393258385E6E1E31815A688AC264E450EB9D7C022