Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 09:20:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 933A0FB395B7DC4D99D81BE25AD05B4A8E0EBE281A80632C15F5DF226B8E529E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. La nota propuesta da a entender que la portada de El País no incluía la mención a la DANA en portada el dia 30, pero puede verse claramente en este post del día 30 a mediodía que sí se citaba: https://x.com/CTuria/status/1851580832948900303 La información de la publicación es por tanto correcta

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851994471090544726
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 933A0FB395B7DC4D99D81BE25AD05B4A8E0EBE281A80632C15F5DF226B8E529E
  • createdAtMillis - 1730452805040
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851994471090544726933A0FB395B7DC4D99D81BE25AD05B4A8E0EBE281A80632C15F5DF226B8E529E