Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-31 13:52:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5FC4454D83A072EF9F729A9A61FDA2FFB31B4AE422CE824C6E427937562BEC55
Participant Details

Original Note:

Three proposed notes, identical to one another in phrasing and linked source. Two of the notes are authored by the same CN contributor. Linked detail is no more reliable than the OP article. Proposed notes appear to be a politically motivated coordination to suppress OP.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851981210345410568
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5FC4454D83A072EF9F729A9A61FDA2FFB31B4AE422CE824C6E427937562BEC55
  • createdAtMillis - 1730382754908
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18519812103454105685FC4454D83A072EF9F729A9A61FDA2FFB31B4AE422CE824C6E427937562BEC55