Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-01 05:20:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 015A0E815DC49FAC716B672BC3CBC15CDA46F994EFF3B67C0048296B5A62F0B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Three proposed notes, identical to one another in phrasing and linked source. Two of the notes are authored by the same CN contributor. Linked detail is no more reliable than the OP article. Proposed notes appear to be a politically motivated coordination to suppress OP.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851981210345410568
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 015A0E815DC49FAC716B672BC3CBC15CDA46F994EFF3B67C0048296B5A62F0B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1730438436460
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851981210345410568015A0E815DC49FAC716B672BC3CBC15CDA46F994EFF3B67C0048296B5A62F0B9