Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-31 16:36:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F706CC5B3065A20B67C33C5671EDADC60DB04F921B4346DD7E786BDAF86788FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

El estudio citado aclara que faltan datos del pasado para valorar y por eso están sobrerepresentados los recientes https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04253-1 Además, el estudio basa la severidad en los daños, al haber más urbanizaciones y terreno ocupado con el tiempo, se producen más daños https://x.com/alvariteus/status/1851634988539601204

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1851876062520590456
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F706CC5B3065A20B67C33C5671EDADC60DB04F921B4346DD7E786BDAF86788FE
createdAtMillis - 1730392581708
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1851876062520590456F706CC5B3065A20B67C33C5671EDADC60DB04F921B4346DD7E786BDAF86788FE