Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-31 06:05:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8633F8086981FD0BEB43905E3B371723A8AC43E7FA2E437B9AE2E0F5815398F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN 全く誤解を招く要素が無い。 この投稿は政府が元々「年収の壁問題」に取り組んで居なかったとは主張しておらず、そもそも政府のこれまでの主張に言及すらしてない点を踏まえれば何ら誤解を招く誤りが含まれるものではありません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851834492195115407
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8633F8086981FD0BEB43905E3B371723A8AC43E7FA2E437B9AE2E0F5815398F
  • createdAtMillis - 1730354746282
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851834492195115407C8633F8086981FD0BEB43905E3B371723A8AC43E7FA2E437B9AE2E0F5815398F