Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-31 00:09:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7A36AF13B6A1B166F8B00524563DCA681D889F9BD93E761C309360F9D3A95067
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Reuters.com" is NOT a trusted source.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851777878444380670
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7A36AF13B6A1B166F8B00524563DCA681D889F9BD93E761C309360F9D3A95067
  • createdAtMillis - 1730333370653
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18517778784443806707A36AF13B6A1B166F8B00524563DCA681D889F9BD93E761C309360F9D3A95067