Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 20:59:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DE4FF0FCF3E4E00D0D8B081FF0F6A1E08D3705184BDEF04D5B8ADC3C2BFCF55B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is very clearly not the kind of unbiased analysis CN requires and instead is being snarky. Save it for the replies, stop abusing CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851724075359437235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DE4FF0FCF3E4E00D0D8B081FF0F6A1E08D3705184BDEF04D5B8ADC3C2BFCF55B
  • createdAtMillis - 1730321956924
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851724075359437235DE4FF0FCF3E4E00D0D8B081FF0F6A1E08D3705184BDEF04D5B8ADC3C2BFCF55B