Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-31 00:14:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD69C586132C9EB457F3DF214972045587440DCBAEE17C84E366C923172C429E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is very clearly not the kind of unbiased analysis CN requires and instead is being snarky. Save it for the replies, stop abusing CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851724075359437235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD69C586132C9EB457F3DF214972045587440DCBAEE17C84E366C923172C429E
  • createdAtMillis - 1730333688025
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851724075359437235DD69C586132C9EB457F3DF214972045587440DCBAEE17C84E366C923172C429E