Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 20:59:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D55E4E1C649B4AB585DBE272AD880D9F9F9481DA0E3FF0F83A5E0F54ED13244A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is very clearly not the kind of unbiased analysis CN requires and instead is being snarky. Save it for the replies, stop abusing CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851724075359437235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D55E4E1C649B4AB585DBE272AD880D9F9F9481DA0E3FF0F83A5E0F54ED13244A
  • createdAtMillis - 1730321972999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851724075359437235D55E4E1C649B4AB585DBE272AD880D9F9F9481DA0E3FF0F83A5E0F54ED13244A