Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 20:40:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55992A265D2FC002E5E2605702B418EC04E4DD13EBD2E1D9CF80C9B623C9A2B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is very clearly not the kind of unbiased analysis CN requires and instead is being snarky. Save it for the replies, stop abusing CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851724075359437235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55992A265D2FC002E5E2605702B418EC04E4DD13EBD2E1D9CF80C9B623C9A2B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1730320859052
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185172407535943723555992A265D2FC002E5E2605702B418EC04E4DD13EBD2E1D9CF80C9B623C9A2B4