Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 20:37:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52A918A143A40FE9534AA996899A48892A959522167AE5E3CDB0A0F60668A5F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is very clearly not the kind of unbiased analysis CN requires and instead is being snarky. Save it for the replies, stop abusing CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851724075359437235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 52A918A143A40FE9534AA996899A48892A959522167AE5E3CDB0A0F60668A5F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1730320636520
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185172407535943723552A918A143A40FE9534AA996899A48892A959522167AE5E3CDB0A0F60668A5F6