Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 21:30:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36DCAD8BF1F564AEF39A2EC7673CBAC341A986635CBD5AB0B15D8B9DF47F28F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Diversity of opinion on earlier CNs will help get a CN posted, but consensus of not helpful will cause no CN to appear at all. Because of this, the Federalist article is correct. Only contributors will see the CNs, not the public at large.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851701095657279538
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36DCAD8BF1F564AEF39A2EC7673CBAC341A986635CBD5AB0B15D8B9DF47F28F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1730323852489
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185170109565727953836DCAD8BF1F564AEF39A2EC7673CBAC341A986635CBD5AB0B15D8B9DF47F28F9