Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 16:09:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F9E45C3791E50E88F9756FDF6879E54A267ABA2665F3D85ADBE469B5EACC1569
Participant Details

Original Note:

El propio estudio citado en el tuit explica que en esta gráfica están sobrerrepresentados los eventos recientes, al no tener información de la mayoría de los antiguos. Posteriormente emplea un algoritmo para corregir este sesgo, que hace desaparecer la tendencia al alza. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04253-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851637352520638649
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F9E45C3791E50E88F9756FDF6879E54A267ABA2665F3D85ADBE469B5EACC1569
  • createdAtMillis - 1730304545294
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851637352520638649F9E45C3791E50E88F9756FDF6879E54A267ABA2665F3D85ADBE469B5EACC1569