Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 15:55:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F91F3F0E70808053CEECD1F29139D2D72EA53549DFB96F336638EA5B1A64A060
Participant Details

Original Note:

El propio estudio citado en el tuit explica que en esta gráfica están sobrerrepresentados los eventos recientes, al no tener información de la mayoría de los antiguos. Posteriormente emplea un algoritmo para corregir este sesgo, que hace desaparecer la tendencia al alza. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04253-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851637352520638649
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F91F3F0E70808053CEECD1F29139D2D72EA53549DFB96F336638EA5B1A64A060
  • createdAtMillis - 1730303718776
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851637352520638649F91F3F0E70808053CEECD1F29139D2D72EA53549DFB96F336638EA5B1A64A060