Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 19:26:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 930AEAB58B629E236FD81A99056C87D771B8048718375AD50C4E1C48DBF9AA4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

El propio estudio citado en el tuit explica que en esta gráfica están sobrerrepresentados los eventos recientes, al no tener información de la mayoría de los antiguos. Posteriormente emplea un algoritmo para corregir este sesgo, que hace desaparecer la tendencia al alza. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04253-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851637352520638649
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 930AEAB58B629E236FD81A99056C87D771B8048718375AD50C4E1C48DBF9AA4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1730316385984
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851637352520638649930AEAB58B629E236FD81A99056C87D771B8048718375AD50C4E1C48DBF9AA4D