Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 19:51:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11D24B98AD2A346E2896ABFA8C491AED9207D836771C59E89F3C93170D5FA422
Participant Details

Original Note:

El propio estudio citado en el tuit explica que en esta gráfica están sobrerrepresentados los eventos recientes, al no tener información de la mayoría de los antiguos. Posteriormente emplea un algoritmo para corregir este sesgo, que hace desaparecer la tendencia al alza. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04253-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851637352520638649
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11D24B98AD2A346E2896ABFA8C491AED9207D836771C59E89F3C93170D5FA422
  • createdAtMillis - 1730317905112
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185163735252063864911D24B98AD2A346E2896ABFA8C491AED9207D836771C59E89F3C93170D5FA422