Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 11:05:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C47A6749B1F13F76425E37402B27694CEF7EA340EDC327843195FF212018E4A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Como afirma este twittero con datos de la propia Aemet, lo que hicieron, ante el fallo de radar de precipitación fue estimar las precipitaciones de la zona basados en radares cercanos. Pero el radar en cuestión no funcionaba https://x.com/Fittisand/status/1851558382940880918?t=Q7-jUSHvenWgQGbt8OZyng&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851579732988465473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C47A6749B1F13F76425E37402B27694CEF7EA340EDC327843195FF212018E4A
  • createdAtMillis - 1730286337123
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18515797329884654734C47A6749B1F13F76425E37402B27694CEF7EA340EDC327843195FF212018E4A