Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 10:58:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F185FB444CE5C8EE483AD00F5165484DE3D8F8A5C4AA432A6EA2E4F1C8708A9F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN clearly satire. It is theft. If the person was not injured, it is unlikely this would be treated as common assault. The DPP would not prosecute, but the person could undertake a private prosecution or sue. The person could claim "whiplash" or other invisible injuries.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851574937091502360
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F185FB444CE5C8EE483AD00F5165484DE3D8F8A5C4AA432A6EA2E4F1C8708A9F
  • createdAtMillis - 1730285925362
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851574937091502360F185FB444CE5C8EE483AD00F5165484DE3D8F8A5C4AA432A6EA2E4F1C8708A9F