Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-31 06:10:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D3C537A71E87C7EC6F05F1E38F413CC4B9D22DDB90E033CC6172C9349C81B948
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN clearly satire. It is theft. If the person was not injured, it is unlikely this would be treated as common assault. The DPP would not prosecute, but the person could undertake a private prosecution or sue. The person could claim "whiplash" or other invisible injuries.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851574937091502360
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D3C537A71E87C7EC6F05F1E38F413CC4B9D22DDB90E033CC6172C9349C81B948
  • createdAtMillis - 1730355014839
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851574937091502360D3C537A71E87C7EC6F05F1E38F413CC4B9D22DDB90E033CC6172C9349C81B948