Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 13:16:06 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21A94093EE0C733008F64C935FEE4AA56DC283B142ED9553819F6E94232F38FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

ID 1851502840910659774は2022年の東京地裁の判決と今回の東京高裁の判決を混同しています。 記事の見出しにも誤解を招く表現は無く、ノートは不要です。 https://news.ntv.co.jp/category/society/55a6cf11cd7544adbcb703755cd4de31

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851536122238976277
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21A94093EE0C733008F64C935FEE4AA56DC283B142ED9553819F6E94232F38FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1730294166171
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185153612223897627721A94093EE0C733008F64C935FEE4AA56DC283B142ED9553819F6E94232F38FC