Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 08:52:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FCCFE6F468A806302E041994511E99966BDC3749C21A0BA0DA86E45342D472E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This takes Mark’s opinion out of context. He does state west ham rejected Amorim but also states it was because of a higher release clause then it was at now. He also seems very excited about the new situation and how the club have handled. Nothing about his was toxic. https://www.youtube.com/live/EZou2KRSDsY?si=KtRaNaH1AzWoVE0S

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851535504962945534
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FCCFE6F468A806302E041994511E99966BDC3749C21A0BA0DA86E45342D472E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1730278372020
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1851535504962945534FCCFE6F468A806302E041994511E99966BDC3749C21A0BA0DA86E45342D472E3