Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 09:01:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F652D1E4C43BE362A8B905C84CFA9EF1F3E021471895F9F112D48688AB344803
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is ridiculous — argues about semantics and misses the point of the tweet, which is not misleading and can be undeniably confirmed by listening to the “tape” provided.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851451146608513166
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F652D1E4C43BE362A8B905C84CFA9EF1F3E021471895F9F112D48688AB344803
  • createdAtMillis - 1730278876259
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851451146608513166F652D1E4C43BE362A8B905C84CFA9EF1F3E021471895F9F112D48688AB344803