Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 14:24:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2DAF44945ED5C7D6030E5F50AF0F6FC8C7E604083E1B7CE4FB0AE5A1F268CC3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is ridiculous — argues about semantics and misses the point of the tweet, which is not misleading and can be undeniably confirmed by listening to the “tape” provided.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851451146608513166
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A2DAF44945ED5C7D6030E5F50AF0F6FC8C7E604083E1B7CE4FB0AE5A1F268CC3
  • createdAtMillis - 1730298274739
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851451146608513166A2DAF44945ED5C7D6030E5F50AF0F6FC8C7E604083E1B7CE4FB0AE5A1F268CC3