Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-31 18:04:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63C31C35FA0454AED88978024FEA4770850F010CED03A2C821A7CC8C2D16C00C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is ridiculous — argues about semantics and misses the point of the tweet, which is not misleading and can be undeniably confirmed by listening to the “tape” provided.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851451146608513166
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 63C31C35FA0454AED88978024FEA4770850F010CED03A2C821A7CC8C2D16C00C
  • createdAtMillis - 1730397867525
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185145114660851316663C31C35FA0454AED88978024FEA4770850F010CED03A2C821A7CC8C2D16C00C