Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 11:24:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is ridiculous — argues about semantics and misses the point of the tweet, which is not misleading and can be undeniably confirmed by listening to the “tape” provided.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851451146608513166
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186
  • createdAtMillis - 1730287499803
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18514511466085131664FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186