Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 03:40:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F1517F9E9293F91289E410B128F546F4C9607B90D9612A44AAD26DAAB4066B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is ridiculous — argues about semantics and misses the point of the tweet, which is not misleading and can be undeniably confirmed by listening to the “tape” provided.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851451146608513166
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F1517F9E9293F91289E410B128F546F4C9607B90D9612A44AAD26DAAB4066B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1730259601214
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18514511466085131664F1517F9E9293F91289E410B128F546F4C9607B90D9612A44AAD26DAAB4066B5